Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/29/2023
State v. Bethel
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4843
Syllabus
Because appellant failed to show he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the ballistic report supporting his successive petition for postconviction relief and motion for a new trial, appellant failed to invoke trial court jurisdiction of the petition and failed to satisfy a threshold requirement for consideration of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Jamison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
- State v. SteffenOhio Supreme Court· 1994-09-28· cited 454×
- State v. BethelOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-04· cited 229×
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 208×
- State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-22· cited 161×
- State v. ThorntonOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-10· cited 43×
- State v. KaneOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-26· cited 42×
- State v. HowardOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-11· cited 23×
- State v. BarnesOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-20· cited 23×
- State v. BethelOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-07· cited 10×
- State v. BlackOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-06· cited 7×
- State v. StewartOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-30· cited 6×
- State v. BethelOhio Supreme Court· 2007-08-29· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.