Nebraska Supreme Court· 6/20/2014
State v. Berney
Citations
- 288 Neb. 377
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[u]nless prohibited by statute or unless the sentencing court states otherwise when it pronounces the sentences, multiple sentences imposed at the same time run concurrently with each other”
- an appellate court will not disturb a sentence imposed within the statutory limits absent an abuse of discretion by the trial court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CastanedaNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-01-13· cited 77×
- State v. GarzaNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-12-30· cited 69×
- State v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-01-15· cited 65×
- State v. MantichNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-12-23· cited 55×
- State v. McMillionNebraska Court of Appeals· 2016-03-01· cited 41×
- State v. LantzNebraska Supreme Court· 2015-04-23· cited 32×
- State v. StoneNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-10-13· cited 22×
- State v. TriceNebraska Supreme Court· 2016-01-15· cited 15×
- State v. HunnelNebraska Supreme Court· 2015-05-29· cited 14×
- State v. EarnestNebraska Supreme Court· 2023-12-01· cited 8×
- State v. HarmsNebraska Supreme Court· 2019-11-08· cited 5×
- State v. TysonNebraska Court of Appeals· 2016-02-23· cited 2×
- In re Estate of GrebNebraska Supreme Court· 2014-06-20
- State v. TackettNebraska Court of Appeals· 2018-10-30
- State v. SessionsNebraska Court of Appeals· 2020-03-31
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.