Skip to main content

State v. Bennett

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 3623

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the state to cross-examine a defense witness about a prior specific instance of appellant's conduct where appellant opened the door to the character evidence by questioning the witness about appellant's character for appropriate behavior with women. Furthermore, appellant's conviction for sexual imposition was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.