State v. Bennett
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3623
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the state to cross-examine a defense witness about a prior specific instance of appellant's conduct where appellant opened the door to the character evidence by questioning the witness about appellant's character for appropriate behavior with women. Furthermore, appellant's conviction for sexual imposition was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-22· cited 192×
- State v. GillardOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 184×
- State v. GrinsteadOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-20· cited 120×
- State v. EubankOhio Supreme Court· 1979-12-26· cited 83×
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-02· cited 56×
- State v. ElliottOhio Supreme Court· 1971-03-17· cited 28×
- State v. MarcumOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-19· cited 17×
- State v. BinksOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-23· cited 12×
- State v. FloresOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-12-30· cited 5×
- State v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-04-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.