Skip to main content
· 4/23/2018

State v. Binks

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 1570
  • 111 N.E.3d 24

Syllabus

Appellant's statutory speedy-trial rights were not violated as the 45-day time period in which the state had to bring appellant to trial was extended by appellant's delay in obtaining representation, defense counsel's request for a continuance, and a seven-day reasonable continuance granted at the state's request to ensure the availability of a state's witness. Further, appellant's conviction for domestic violence was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and the trial court did not err in admitting \other acts\ evidence in accordance with Evid.R. 404(B) as the victim's testimony about past incidents in which appellant physically abused her was relevant, offered for a legitimate purpose, and its probative value was not outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.

Judges: Hendrickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.