State v. Bell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e conclude that appellee failed to establish any state or federal constitution privacy interest.”
• \[W]e conclude that appellee failed to establish any state or federal constitution privacy interest.\
• “[W]e conclude that appellee failed to establish any state or federal constitution privacy interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bell
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-05-23· cited 6×
• State of Texas v. Bell, Mark Steven
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2012-05-23

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rakas v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
• Villarreal v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-20· cited 1,246×
• Kothe v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-10-20· cited 930×
• State v. Mercado
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-05-27· cited 244×
• Miles v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-10-17· cited 162×
• State v. Klima
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-10-02· cited 157×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1984-09-19· cited 131×
• Hollis v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2007-02-16· cited 130×
• United States v. Gonzalez, Inc. Dba Golden State Transportation
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-06-22· cited 84×
• State v. Consaul
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-11-25· cited 33×
• Kelley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 30×
• Tu Minh Trinh v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1998-07-23· cited 29×
• Franklin v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 1995-12-27· cited 28×
• Pham v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2010-10-14· cited 23×