Supreme Court of Iowa· 5/24/1995

State v. Beckett

Citations

532 N.W.2d 751
1995 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 98
1995 WL 327017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that warrant documents are “normally drafted by nonlawyers in the midst and haste of a criminal investigation”
determining that magistrate identified testimony and information relied upon but failed to give specific reasons for finding informant or information reliable and thus did not satisfy the statute
reviewing for correction of errors at law when the defendant “challenges only the statutory sufficiency of the warrant and not its constitutional validity”
reviewing for correction of errors at law when the defendant “challenges only the statutory sufficiency of the warrant and not its constitutional validity”
reviewing for correction of errors at law when the defendant “challenges only the statutory sufficiency of the warrant and not its constitutional validity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Lavorato, Neuman, Andreasen, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.