Supreme Court of Iowa· 7/18/1990
State v. Becker
Citations
- 458 N.W.2d 604
- 1990 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 181
- 1990 WL 102410
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that where the stop of the vehicle was lawful, the driver lacked standing to object to the illegal out-of-vehicle detention of the passenger which provided facts leading to the frisk of the driver
- stating a person who has committed a traffic offense is “technically subject to full custodial arrest”
- considering, pre-Wilson, whether Mimms rationale extends to passengers and determining that articulable grounds for suspicion are necessary before an officer can order a passenger from a vehicle
- defendant’s lack of standing to challenge alleged violation of rights of other person precluded right to suppress evidence illegally obtained from such other person
- driver of automobile had legitimate expectation of privacy in passenger compartment of his vehicle, but State did not unreasonably intrude on that interest where officer had probable cause to stop vehicle
- articulable suspicion of criminal activity of speeding driver did not extend to passenger
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McGiverin, Harris, Schultz, Carter, Lavorato
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Knowles v. IowaSupreme Court· 1998-12-08· cited 800×
- Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-06-14· cited 162×
- State v. HalliburtonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1995-10-25· cited 121×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-01-26· cited 107×
- State v. BreuerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1998-03-25· cited 84×
- State v. HortonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-03-21· cited 32×
- Bethea v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-05-26· cited 31×
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-06-22· cited 30×
- People v. MartinezMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-01-22· cited 28×
- State v. KovachMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-09-04· cited 28×
- State v. GarrowSupreme Court of Iowa· 1992-01-22· cited 26×
- Bethea v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1993-04-16· cited 25×
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa· 1995-04-26· cited 25×
- Cousart v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-18· cited 24×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-08-30· cited 24×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa· 2004-06-16· cited 23×
- State v. RileySupreme Court of Iowa· 1993-06-16· cited 22×
- Rhodes v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1999-05-04· cited 21×
- State v. MeyerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-02-14· cited 20×
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Iowa· 1995-09-20· cited 16×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 2,470×
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1947-06-09· cited 1,370×
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court· 1951-11-26· cited 1,320×
- United States v. Anthony HardnettSixth Circuit· 1986-11-06· cited 127×
- Commonwealth v. ElliottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-08-05· cited 75×
- State v. EisSupreme Court of Iowa· 1984-05-16· cited 42×
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-11-25· cited 41×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-12-15· cited 34×
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-05-19· cited 34×
- State v. OsbornSupreme Court of Iowa· 1972-09-19· cited 29×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1980-01-31· cited 14×
- People v. McLaurinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-11-25· cited 14×
- State v. ShankSupreme Court of Iowa· 1971-11-11· cited 8×
- State v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 1979-06-28· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.