Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/15/2024
State v. Beck
Citations
- 236 N.E.3d 408
- 2024 Ohio 578
Syllabus
R.C. 2921.331 mandatory advisement consecutive sentence Crim.R. 11 not a complete failure to comply prejudice. Where the appellant did not show any prejudice resulted from the trial court's incomplete advisements on consecutive sentencing pursuant to R.C. 2921.331, the trial court complied with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a).
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court· 1977-07-13· cited 788×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 403×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 1988-12-28· cited 238×
- Hayward v. Summa Health System/Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 86×
- Wagner v. Roche LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court· 1999-05-12· cited 74×
- State v. WillardOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-26· cited 30×
- State v. FabianOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-03· cited 29×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-23· cited 23×
- McKinney v. Haviland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-10-07· cited 12×
- State v. BaileyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-13· cited 10×
- State v. GabbardOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-12· cited 10×
- State v. CoverOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-15· cited 4×
- State v. FisherOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-06· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.