Ohio Court of Appeals· 10/11/2019
State v. Beard
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 4178
Syllabus
The trial court failed to determine that appellant entered her plea \with an understanding of\ the maximum penalty, as required by Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a), after she orally expressed that she did not understand the potential maximum penalty she faced. Judgment reversed and remanded. (Tucker, J., dissenting.)
Judges: Froelich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. VeneyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 725×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 654×
- State v. SarkozyOhio Supreme Court· 2008-02-14· cited 403×
- State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-21· cited 173×
- State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-24· cited 131×
- State v. ColeOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-18· cited 32×
- State v. BatemanOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-10· cited 21×
- State v. McGlinchOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-12· cited 10×
- State v. HastingsOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-02· cited 5×
- State v. DorseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-02-26· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.