Skip to main content

State v. Beard

Citations

  • 380 N.W.2d 537
  • 1986 Minn. App. LEXIS 3911

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “minor inconsistencies between [the victim’s] testimony and her previous statements are not grounds for reversing the jury’s guilty verdict”
  • \minor inconsistencies between [the victim's] testimony and her previous statements are not grounds for reversing the jury's guilty verdict\
  • “On review, this court will assume the jury believed the State’s witnesses and disbelieved any contradictory testimony”
  • sexual assault complainant’s testimony taken as a whole was consistent and credible
  • sexual assault complainant’s testimony taken as a whole was consistent and credible
  • sexual assault complainant's testimony taken as a whole was consistent and credible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.