Skip to main content

State v. B.B

Citations

  • 300 Conn. 748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘no clause, sentence or word shall be superfluous, void or insignificant’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • ‘‘[w]here a statute, with reference to one subject contains a given provi- sion, the omission of such provision from a similar statute concerning a related subject . . . is significant to show that a different intention existed’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • ‘‘[when] a statute, with reference to one subject contains a given provision, the omission of such provision from a similar statute concerning a related subject . . . is significant to show that a differ- ent intention existed’’ [internal quotation marks omit- ted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eveleigh, McLachlan, Norcott, Palmer, Rogers, Vertefeuille, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.