Skip to main content

Hicks v. State

Citations

  • 1 A.3d 39
  • 297 Conn. 798
  • 2010 Conn. LEXIS 279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining plain meaning rule under General Statutes § 1-2z and setting forth process for ascertaining legislative intent
  • setting forth process of ascertaining legislative intent pursuant to General Statutes § l-2z
  • interest pursuant to § 37-3b is computed only after judgment, upon amount rendered therein, and accrues only if judgment is not paid
  • ‘‘[I]nterest awarded pursuant to § 37-3b is in addition to and based upon the amount of damages as determined by the trier of fact. Postjudg- ment interest, therefore, cannot be an element of dam- ages.’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, McLachlan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.