Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/17/2010
Hicks v. State
Citations
- 1 A.3d 39
- 297 Conn. 798
- 2010 Conn. LEXIS 279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining plain meaning rule under General Statutes § 1-2z and setting forth process for ascertaining legislative intent
- setting forth process of ascertaining legislative intent pursuant to General Statutes § l-2z
- interest pursuant to § 37-3b is computed only after judgment, upon amount rendered therein, and accrues only if judgment is not paid
- ‘‘[I]nterest awarded pursuant to § 37-3b is in addition to and based upon the amount of damages as determined by the trier of fact. Postjudg- ment interest, therefore, cannot be an element of dam- ages.’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, McLachlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Brown v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-10-04· cited 19×
- Graham v. Comm'r of Transp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-11-20· cited 18×
- C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-12-07· cited 17×
- State v. BBSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-05-10· cited 13×
- State v. B.BSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-05-10· cited 13×
- Stotler v. Department of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-05-28· cited 9×
- Feliciano v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-08-24· cited 8×
- Connecticut Judicial Branch v. GilbertSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2022-04-26· cited 8×
- Connecticut Motor Cars v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-04-19· cited 7×
- Raspberry Junction Holding, LLC v. Southeastern Connecticut Water AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-04-09· cited 6×
- Muckle v. PressleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2018-10-16· cited 4×
- Graham v. FriedlanderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-02-04· cited 4×
- Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2020-06-03· cited 3×
- Spillane v. LamontSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-07-30· cited 2×
- Taylor v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-08-16· cited 1×
- Morneau v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-05-20
- State v. Douglas C.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2023-01-10
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.