State v. Bayman
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4600
Syllabus
Conceded error. In this reopened appeal, the trial court erred in denying appellant's motion to suppress where the deputy lacked probable cause to search appellant for contraband based solely on a K-9 alert while appellant was seated as a passenger in a vehicle. Appellant's original counsel rendered ineffective assistance in failing to raise the issue. Prior appellate judgment vacated. Trial court judgment reversed and remanded.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- State v. EvansOhio Supreme Court· 1993-09-22· cited 502×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 2000-09-20· cited 370×
- State v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-12-11· cited 85×
- State v. Leyh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-02-08· cited 76×
- United States v. Erick AnchondoTenth Circuit· 1998-09-01· cited 54×
- Whitehead v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia· 2009-09-18· cited 43×
- State v. LloydOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-01· cited 35×
- State v. ClarkOhio Supreme Court· 2025-09-24· cited 11×
- State v. BoyceOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-02· cited 9×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2024-10-10· cited 8×
- State v. OwensbyOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-23· cited 4×
- State v. BaymanOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-15· cited 3×
- State v. DudsakOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-12· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.