Washington Supreme Court· 4/30/1970
State v. Bauman
Citations
- 468 P.2d 684
- 77 Wash. 2d 938
- 1970 Wash. LEXIS 392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where defendant was charged with murdering his girl friend, requiring him to try on blood stained shirt found at the murder scene to determine whether it fit him did not violate the privilege
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rosellini
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. MusicWashington Supreme Court· 1971-09-30· cited 61×
- State v. HarmanWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1980-09-16· cited 49×
- State v. FlettCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-04-16· cited 37×
- State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1976-11-23· cited 36×
- State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-26· cited 35×
- United States v. AyalaU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1986-06-23· cited 13×
- State v. RodriguezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1988-04-20· cited 10×
- State v. RiconosciutoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-12-23· cited 9×
- Brooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-11-09· cited 5×
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-12· cited 2×
- State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-01-18· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court· 1953-02-05· cited 43×
- State v. WestWashington Supreme Court· 1967-03-16· cited 26×
- State v. DureeWashington Supreme Court· 1958-05-08· cited 24×
- State v. DuckettWashington Supreme Court· 1968-05-02· cited 17×
- State v. JohnsenWashington Supreme Court· 1969-09-18· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.