State v. Barr
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2690
Syllabus
Repeat violent offender specification 1984 rape conviction voidable res judicata. The trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over the case and personal jurisdiction over the defendant and, therefore, under State v. Harper, 160 Ohio St.3d 480, 2020-Ohio-2913, 159 N.E.3d 248, and State v. Henderson, 161 Ohio St.3d 285, 2020-Ohio-4784, 162 N.E.3d 776, any sentencing error, to the extent one even exists, renders the sentence voidable, not void. Voidable sentencing errors must be raised on direct appeal. Appellant's contention that his 1984 rape conviction was too old to form the basis of the repeat violent offender specification attendant to his 2007 conviction in this case is res judicata since he failed to raise the issue in his direct appeal.
Judges: O'Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 802×
- State v. Harper (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-14· cited 319×
- State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-10-07· cited 274×
- State v. WarrenOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-29· cited 16×
- State ex rel. Barr v. SutulaOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-02-06· cited 1×
- State v. SatterfieldOhio Supreme Court· 2008-10-29· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.