State v. Barnett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that motion to suppress was sufficient where motion contained adequate negative facts, even though motion did not identify number of officers involved with search

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-08-31· cited 11×
• McNeece v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-11-08· cited 5×
• State v. Warren
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-06· cited 4×
• Dean v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-10-04· cited 3×
• James M. Lovell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2025-09-18

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Matlock
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
• Lavelle v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-11-16· cited 35×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-02-26· cited 17×
• Hill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-09-20· cited 9×
• Stanley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-11-02· cited 8×
• Young v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-03-05· cited 6×
• Farley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-05-08· cited 6×
• State v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-09-11· cited 2×
• State v. Baenett
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-07-16· cited 1×