Stanley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that statements in a brief could be considered in determining the sufficiency of the motion to suppress
• concluding that statements in a brief could be considered in determining the sufficiency of the motion to suppress
• issue raised in a brief filed with motion to suppress could be considered as part of the motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Poppell
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2004-02-16· cited 13×
• Stanley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-05-02· cited 13×
• Hill v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-09-20· cited 9×
• State v. Roddy
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-03-11· cited 7×
• Young v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-03-05· cited 6×
• WINGATE v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-09-19· cited 6×
• State v. Barnett
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-07-16· cited 5×
• State v. Baenett
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-07-16· cited 1×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lavelle v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-11-16· cited 35×
• Harvill v. THE STATE
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-02-17· cited 9×