Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 5/11/2001
State v. Barnard
Citations
- 2001 ME 80
- 772 A.2d 852
- 2001 Me. LEXIS 71
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that direct or circumstantial evidence, including testimony of a witness who has experience based on familiarity with the drugs through law enforcement, can establish beyond a reasonable doubt the identity of drugs
- stating that direct or circumstantial evidence, including testimony of a witness who has experience based on familiarity with the drugs through law enforcement, can establish beyond a reasonable doubt the identity of drugs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wathen, Clifford, Rudman, Dana, Saufley, Alexander, Calkins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2006-03-02· cited 33×
- State v. BasuSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2005-06-20· cited 17×
- State v. RollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2008-12-18· cited 14×
- State v. WooSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2007-12-20· cited 11×
- State v. MooresSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2009-10-06· cited 11×
- State of Maine v. Franklin F. Arbour Jr.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2016-08-11· cited 9×
- State of Maine v. Abdirahmon A. AbdullahiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2023-07-27· cited 8×
- State of Maine v. Christopher SudsburySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2016-02-04· cited 2×
- State of Maine v. Dale M. BrackettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2023-08-15· cited 2×
- State of Maine v. Michael W. ChapmanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2014-05-22· cited 1×
- State of Maine v. Timothy D. CurtisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2019-06-20
- State v. BairdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2004-04-27
- United States v. Moran-StensonFirst Circuit· 2024-08-22
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. Wilson Tony Harrell, James Hawkins, Anthony Scire, Karl Heinz HarigEleventh Circuit· 1984-07-30· cited 132×
- State v. MardenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1996-02-07· cited 50×
- United States v. Miguel Dimarzo, A/K/A Michael Dimarzo, United States of America v. Mario J. Alzate-YepezFirst Circuit· 1996-05-13· cited 29×
- State v. HowesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1981-07-17· cited 29×
- Copeland v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1982-01-18· cited 28×
- State v. BishopSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1978-09-29· cited 27×
- State v. ChristiansonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1979-08-21· cited 20×
- State v. PierceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2001-01-24· cited 17×
- State v. BonneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1976-02-04· cited 16×
- State v. StinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2000-05-17· cited 13×
- State v. ClarkeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1999-10-13· cited 8×
- State v. DeeringSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1992-07-14· cited 8×
- State v. LavigneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-04-03· cited 7×
- State v. SpoonerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1995-10-19· cited 7×
- State v. DupraySupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-07-30· cited 2×
- State v. RossSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1991-06-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.