Idaho Supreme Court· 1/17/2002
State v. Barker
Citations
- 40 P.3d 86
- 136 Idaho 728
- 2002 Ida. LEXIS 3
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding apparent authority issue as a matter of law on uncontroverted facts
- upholding a warrant-less search of the common areas in an apartment occupied by a parolee and another person
- warrantless search of fanny pack in apartment where parolee resided with his girlfriend did not violate girlfriend’s Fourth Amendment rights because officer had reasonable suspicion that parolee had joint control and thus authority to consent to the search
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eismann, Trout, Schroeder, Walters, Kidwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. MerrowColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-08-23· cited 22×
- State v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court· 2011-07-11· cited 20×
- State v. CruzIdaho Court of Appeals· 2007-06-12· cited 14×
- State v. DoeIdaho Supreme Court· 2010-06-01· cited 12×
- State v. FancherIdaho Court of Appeals· 2008-06-05· cited 8×
- State v. SpencerIdaho Court of Appeals· 2004-02-23· cited 8×
- State v. Dona Nichoeal WestlakeIdaho Court of Appeals· 2015-05-28· cited 4×
- State v. RobinsonIdaho Court of Appeals· 2012-05-02· cited 3×
- State v. GarnettIdaho Supreme Court· 2019-06-10· cited 3×
- State v. Matt Eugene RuckIdaho Supreme Court· 2013-11-26· cited 1×
- State v. Richard H. Hansen, Sr.Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-07-15
- State v. GarnettIdaho Supreme Court· 2019-02-20
- State v. HornIdaho Supreme Court· 2025-12-09
- State v. ReyesIdaho Court of Appeals· 2026-03-26
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.