State v. Barboza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Dorman not applicable because its factors “apply to entries made to effect an arrest, such as in a situation of ‘hot pursuit,’ ” but the case at hand “involve[d] entry made to rescue any injured persons and for the safety of the public and police”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Ferral
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-12-23· cited 24×
• State v. Lowrimore
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-12-14· cited 23×
• State v. Richmond
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-05-11· cited 10×
• State v. Thompson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-08-02· cited 6×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• Harold B. Dorman v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1970-04-15· cited 617×
• State v. Terrovona
  Washington Supreme Court· 1986-05-13· cited 211×
• State v. Chrisman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-01-26· cited 165×
• State v. Loewen
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-07-01· cited 112×
• State v. Lynd
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-05-01· cited 60×
• State v. Bean
  Washington Supreme Court· 1978-01-05· cited 59×
• State v. Sanders
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1973-02-06· cited 48×
• State v. Raines
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-09-18· cited 40×
• State v. Bakke
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-08-11· cited 35×
• State v. Nichols
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1978-06-19· cited 33×
• State v. Downey
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-01-09· cited 24×
• United States v. Herndon
  S.D. Florida· 1975-02-20· cited 24×
• State v. McAlpin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-02-21· cited 20×
• People v. White
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-07-30· cited 1×