State v. Banks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing CrR 6.1(d), which similar to JuCR 7.11(d) requires written findings and conclusions following a bench trial
• conviction affirmed despite trial court's failure to make a finding on an essential element of the offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Of Washington, V. Timothy Forrest Bass
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-08-16· cited 26×
• State Of Washington, V. Timothy Forrest Bass
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2021-06-01

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brecht v. Abrahamson
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
• Neder v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
• United States v. Gaudin
  Supreme Court· 1995-06-19· cited 2,553×
• Rose v. Clark
  Supreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 2,431×
• State v. Salinas
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 1,796×
• State v. Powell
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-04-13· cited 542×
• State v. Brown
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-09-19· cited 271×
• State v. Alvarez
  Washington Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 174×
• State v. Head
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-10-08· cited 117×
• State v. Anderson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2000-08-10· cited 116×
• State v. Banks
  Washington Supreme Court· 2003-04-03· cited 34×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-02-16· cited 15×
• State v. Jones
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-04-30· cited 10×
• State v. Banks
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-02-11· cited 3×