Skip to main content
· 4/7/2017

State v. Bandedo

Citations

  • 2017 Ohio 1301

Syllabus

The evidence supporting Appellant's arson conviction is sufficient. And the manifest weight of the evidence is not against the conviction. The trial court did not err by overruling Appellant's motion for a new trial. The charge that the trial court gave to the jury after it reported that it was deadlocked on the question of conviction substantially complies with the charge approved in State v. Howard, 42 Ohio St.3d 18, 537 N.E.2d 188 (1989). Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.