Skip to main content

State v. Ballard

Citations

  • 259 N.E.3d 149
  • 2024 Ohio 6074

Syllabus

Hearsay testimony inadmissible unless exception applies; Evid.R. 803; present sense impression exception to hearsay; confrontation clause; testimony regarding officers' next step in investigation; evidence of defendant's prior bad acts generally inadmissible; where testimony is presented indicating defendant was involved in some investigation but his role is undefined and no details are provided as to his involvement, testimony does not comprise prior bad acts testimony; manifest weight of the evidence.

Judges: Waite

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.