State v. Ballard
Citations
- 259 N.E.3d 149
- 2024 Ohio 6074
Syllabus
Hearsay testimony inadmissible unless exception applies; Evid.R. 803; present sense impression exception to hearsay; confrontation clause; testimony regarding officers' next step in investigation; evidence of defendant's prior bad acts generally inadmissible; where testimony is presented indicating defendant was involved in some investigation but his role is undefined and no details are provided as to his involvement, testimony does not comprise prior bad acts testimony; manifest weight of the evidence.
Judges: Waite
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1984-04-18· cited 4,990×
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
- State v. McKelton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-13· cited 457×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 417×
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 310×
- State v. RicksOhio Supreme Court· 2013-09-05· cited 102×
- State v. MastelOhio Supreme Court· 1971-06-09· cited 62×
- State v. BarnhartOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-06-30· cited 53×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-16· cited 8×
- State v. MauldinOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-09-01· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.