Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/6/1993
State v. Ball
Citations
- 226 Conn. 265
- 627 A.2d 892
- 1993 Conn. LEXIS 208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- facial void for vagueness analysis applied to General Statutes § 53a-183a, the Hunter Harassment Act
- \this court lacks the authority to reshape public policy by construing a statute in a manner that alters its inherent meaning\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-04-05· cited 150×
- Ramos v. Town of VernonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-11-21· cited 88×
- State v. LinaresSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-03-14· cited 81×
- State v. DeFrancescoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-11-21· cited 66×
- Sweetman v. State Elections Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-06-22· cited 66×
- Benjamin v. BaileySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-07-25· cited 50×
- People v. SandersIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-06-18· cited 43×
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-03-20· cited 32×
- State v. ARTHUR H.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-08-26· cited 25×
- Tavella v. Edwards (In Re Edwards)D. Connecticut· 1994-09-26· cited 19×
- State v. LinaresConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-07-23· cited 12×
- Woodstock Hunt Club v. HindiAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-09-11· cited 11×
- State v. BallSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-05-21· cited 6×
- Gross v. RellD. Connecticut· 2007-04-20· cited 5×
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 3,604×
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court· 1976-06-07· cited 3,450×
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 2,855×
- R. A. v. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 2,052×
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 1,847×
- Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1989-06-21· cited 1,671×
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court· 1987-06-15· cited 1,428×
- Frisby v. SchultzSupreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 1,207×
- Boos v. BarrySupreme Court· 1988-03-22· cited 1,104×
- International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. LeeSupreme Court· 1992-06-26· cited 787×
- Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court· 1983-03-29· cited 503×
- Arcara v. Cloud Books, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-07-07· cited 341×
- State v. PickeringSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-03-04· cited 123×
- Furstein v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-14· cited 81×
- Scalzo v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-12-08· cited 76×
- State v. CavalloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 65×
- Francelle Dorman v. C. Robert Satti and Lester J. ForstSecond Circuit· 1988-12-07· cited 52×
- State v. ProtoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-06-02· cited 46×
- State Ex Rel. Kennedy v. FrauwirthSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1974-08-20· cited 34×
- Winchester & Western Railroad v. Virginia Corp. CommissionSupreme Court· 1989-06-05· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.