Woodstock Hunt Club v. Hindi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the Act does not single out any particular thought or opinion for prohibition, but “merely prohibits intentional interference with the lawful taking of wild animals”
• the Act does not single out any particular thought or opinion for prohibition, but “merely prohibits intentional interference with the lawful taking of wild animals”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).