Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/17/2023
State v. Baker
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 855
Syllabus
The trial court erred by ordering appellant to pay sanctions for filing a frivolous appeal. The trial court had no authority to determine whether the appeal was frivolous and whether to impose sanctions on that basis. Pursuant to App.R. 23, those determinations are solely for the appellate court. Judgment vacated.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re S.J.Ohio Supreme Court· 2005-07-13· cited 130×
- State v. BistrickyOhio Supreme Court· 1990-05-30· cited 99×
- Conner v. Travis CountyFifth Circuit· 2000-05-03· cited 90×
- State v. KeetonOhio Supreme Court· 1985-08-07· cited 58×
- Azizian v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-08-23· cited 47×
- In Re American President Lines, Inc., Marshall P. SafirD.C. Circuit· 1985-12-20· cited 33×
- State ex rel. Yates v. Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court· 1987-08-12· cited 31×
- In Re Terrance P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 1997-12-15· cited 14×
- State v. FraleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-20· cited 7×
- Vaughn v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Fifth Circuit· 2007-10-31· cited 6×
- Asamoah v. SYGMA Network, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-06-02· cited 6×
- In re Estate of GarzaOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-25· cited 5×
- Figetakis v. My Pillow, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-31· cited 5×
- Helfrich v. MadisonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-05· cited 3×
- Willoughby v. WilloughbyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-16· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.