Planchak v. Ladd

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 1836

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling appellant's untimely Civ.R. 60(B) motion to vacate judgment, which was filed 15 years after the judgment was entered. Appellant could not rely upon the grounds for relief in Civ.R. 60(B)(3) due to the untimeliness of his motion, and he did not demonstrate substantial grounds warranting relief under Civ.R. 60(B)(5) due to a fraud upon the court. Appellee's motion for attorney fees is not properly before us. Judgment affirmed.