State v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that sentencing error “requires no remedial action” because the challenged 21-month sentence was concurrent to a 24-month term imposed in a separate case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Ignacio Gutierrez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-02-16· cited 21×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Tremillion
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-02-12· cited 18×
• State v. Seals
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-01· cited 17×
• State v. Bucholz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-01· cited 16×