Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/12/2023
State v. Bailey
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1594
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in failing to grant motion to suppress, as (1) the initial traffic stop, (2) the continued detention for field sobriety testing, and (3) the arrest were all lawful. Further, the trial court also did not err in deciding not to vacate Bailey's ALS suspension. Sulek.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. MaysOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-16· cited 383×
- State v. MartoranaOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-03· cited 11×
- State v. GroszewskiOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-08-14· cited 4×
- State v. BruckOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-13· cited 2×
- United States v. YounisN.D. Ohio· 2012-07-16· cited 2×
- Miracle v. PetitOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-20· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.