State v. Bruck
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2789
Syllabus
Reasonable suspicion exists to conduct field sobriety tests where in the early morning hours appellant turns his vehicle around in the middle of the road, runs a stop sign, has glassy and bloodshot eyes, has slightly slurred and lethargic speech, and a strong odor of alcohol is coming from the car.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating jury was free to reject appellant’s argument that “when he pulled the gun on Victim he was fearful that Victim was about to shoot him”
- witness's signed and adopted statement was admissible as both impeachment and substantive evidence, despite witness's denial at trial of making the statement
- “it is for the fact finder to make credibility determinations, and the finder of fact may believe all, part, or none of a witness’s testimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pietrykowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.