Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/3/2023
State v. Bailey
Citations
- 210 N.E.3d 1
- 2023 Ohio 657
Syllabus
Drawing all inferences in favor of state, the state presented sufficient evidence that appellant sold carfentanil to victim, causing victim's death. Jury did not lose its way when it rejected appellant's testimony that the \drug\ he sold to victim was really baking soda. Counsel was not ineffective for failing to object to state calling a witness out of order.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. PinkermanOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-21· cited 7×
- State v. CokerOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-01· cited 4×
- State v. WaltonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-31· cited 1×
- State v. SharpeOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-31
- State v. Alexander-KeelsOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-16
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-18
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 898×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- State v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-07-26· cited 274×
- State v. FiliaggiOhio Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 233×
- State v. Richardson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-29· cited 210×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2002-01-30· cited 156×
- State v. MessengerOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-17· cited 68×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.