Skip to main content

State v. Bailey

Citations

  • 201 N.E.3d 18
  • 2022 Ohio 4028

Syllabus

MOTION TO SUPPRESS – MIRANDA – CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION – FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE The trial court erred by denying defendant's motion to suppress a statement made by defendant about the possession of marijuana and derivative evidence found based on that statement, because defendant made the statement while subject to custodial interrogation without first being advised of his Miranda rights, where he was ordered out of his vehicle, handcuffed, patted down, surrounded by police officers, questioned about the contents of his vehicle, and told that a K 9 unit would be walked around his car.

Judges: Crouse

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.