State v. Bailey
Citations
- 201 N.E.3d 18
- 2022 Ohio 4028
Syllabus
MOTION TO SUPPRESS – MIRANDA – CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION – FRUIT OF THE POISONOUS TREE The trial court erred by denying defendant's motion to suppress a statement made by defendant about the possession of marijuana and derivative evidence found based on that statement, because defendant made the statement while subject to custodial interrogation without first being advised of his Miranda rights, where he was ordered out of his vehicle, handcuffed, patted down, surrounded by police officers, questioned about the contents of his vehicle, and told that a K 9 unit would be walked around his car.
Judges: Crouse
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. FarrisOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-12· cited 172×
- In re Ohio Criminal Sentencing Statutes CasesOhio Supreme Court· 2006-07-12· cited 117×
- State v. StrozierOhio Court of Appeals· 2007-08-31· cited 68×
- Cleveland v. Oles (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-07-19· cited 54×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2007-12-28· cited 28×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-15· cited 9×
- State v. WithrowOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-17· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.