State v. Bailey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We have consistently held that in determining the validity of an investigatory stop police officers are bound by the real reasons for their actions.”
• “We have consistently held that in determining the validity of an investigatory stop police officers are bound by the real reasons for their actions.”
• affirmed on condition and remanded for reopening of suppression hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle Brown
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2019-06-28· cited 135×
• State v. Franklin
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1992-11-24· cited 86×
• State v. Heminover
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2000-11-16· cited 63×
• State v. Garcia
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1990-10-17· cited 36×
• State v. Watkins
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1990-11-21· cited 19×
• State v. Jamison
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1992-03-18· cited 11×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 1991-10-29· cited 3×
• State v. Ohlsen
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 1995-06-27
• State of Iowa v. Lamont Coleman
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2017-01-11

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Hensley
  Supreme Court· 1985-01-08· cited 2,340×
• United States v. Steven Linwood Robinson
  Ninth Circuit· 1976-06-16· cited 143×
• State v. Lamp
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1982-07-21· cited 71×
• People v. Hazelhurst
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1983-05-02· cited 49×
• State v. Aschenbrenner
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1980-03-19· cited 47×
• State v. Cooley
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1975-05-21· cited 45×
• People v. Brown
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-09-05· cited 31×
• United States v. Kevin Dewayne Mobley, United States of America v. Erick Conta Barrett
  Fourth Circuit· 1983-01-25· cited 16×