Skip to main content

State v. Franklin

Citations

  • 841 S.W.2d 639
  • 1992 WL 308891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, because there was no evidence that the dispatch relied upon by the officer was supported by reasonable suspicion, the stop of the defendant was invalid
  • holding that the police officer lacked the requisite reasonable suspicion to make an investigatory stop of respondent’s vehicle and, therefore, the trial court’s granting of the motion to suppress was not in error as alleged by the State
  • holding evidence from a stop inadmissible when no showing was made that the officer “independently observed behavior” corroborating dispatch information and the record was silent as to its source
  • noting no rational distinction between stop made in reliance on police radio dispatch or wanted flyer; citing cases
  • noting no rational distinction between stop made in reliance on police radio dispatch or wanted flyer; citing cases
  • finding a Terry stop unsupported by reasonable suspicion where the record was silent about the source of information relayed to the arresting officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Covington, Benton, Thomas, Limbaugh, Robertson, Holstein, Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.