Skip to main content

State v. Bacon

Citations

  • 733 A.2d 50
  • 169 Vt. 268
  • 1999 Vt. LEXIS 91

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court’s consideration of improper aggravating factor was harmless in context of multifactored sentencing determination
  • holding that any error in considering victim’s standing in the community was harmless where record showed that other valid aggravating factors established an “independent basis for the sentencing decision”
  • concluding that court’s allegedly erroneous consideration of aggravating factor was harmless because “the court’s analysis of the statutory aggravating and mitigating factors provided an independent basis” for its sentencing decision
  • explaining that under Vermont Rule of Criminal Procedure 52(a), harmless error is any error that “does not affect substantial rights of a defendant”
  • where other appropriate factors provide an independent basis for the sentencing decision, error is harmless
  • “The harmless error doctrine applies to sentencing proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.