State v. Bachman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \What we said in . . . Baker and . . . Renfro is still determinative. . . .\
• appellate jurisdiction limited to issues which had been before the district court in proper procedural posture
• “What we said in ... Baker and ... Renfro is still determinative ....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mallan
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1998-01-30· cited 53×
• State v. Tate
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1986-02-24· cited 50×
• United States v. Cannabis Cultivators Club
  N.D. California· 1998-05-13· cited 25×
• State v. Romano
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2007-03-30· cited 20×
• Commonwealth v. Hutchins
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1991-07-24· cited 18×
• State v. Poling
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2000-05-08· cited 15×
• State v. Kealoha
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1992-03-13· cited 9×
• State v. Bonjour
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2005-02-11· cited 7×
• People v. Bordowitz
  Criminal Court of the City of New York· 1991-06-25· cited 7×
• Mohr v. Kelley
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2000-02-17· cited 5×
• Kauffman v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-11-25· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Batson
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1992-06-04· cited 174×
• State v. Horn
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1977-08-05· cited 28×
• State v. Baker
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1975-05-12· cited 24×
• State v. Renfro
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1975-11-12· cited 21×