New Mexico Court of Appeals· 7/8/1993
State v. Baca
Citations
- 116 N.M. 19
- 859 P.2d 487
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A party opposing summary disposition 2 1 is required to come forward and specifically point out errors in fact and/or law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Alarid, Bivins, Flores
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matter of Adoption of DoeNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1984-02-29· cited 839×
- Woolwine v. Furr's, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1987-10-20· cited 300×
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1986-09-22· cited 175×
- United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1955-08-19· cited 75×
- Green v. Convening AuthorityUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1970-07-23· cited 24×
- United States v. BermanU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1989-03-16· cited 24×
- United States v. MabeUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1989-06-30· cited 5×
- United States v. JonesU S Air Force Court of Military Review· 1976-12-27· cited 4×
- United States v. GlidewellU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1985-01-15· cited 4×
- United States v. RiceUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1983-07-20· cited 2×
- United States v. InmanU.S. Army Court of Military Review· 1985-06-24· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.