New Mexico Court of Appeals· 4/7/1993
State v. Baca
Citations
- 854 P.2d 363
- 115 N.M. 536
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that specific incidents of a victim’s conduct are not admissible to show that the victim was the first aggx*essor
- holding that specific instances of the victim’s 4 violent conduct are not admissible under Rule 11-405(B) NMRA to prove the victim 5 acted violently on the specific occasion
- holding victim’s character for violence not essential element of self-defense and not provable by evidence of specific acts
- stating that trial counsel's strategy and tactics will not be second-guessed on appeal
- stating that “evidence of prior specific incidents may also be admitted under [Rule] 11-404(B)”
- noting that evidence of specific incidents of conduct may be admitted under Rule 11-404(B)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Minzner, Bivins, Hartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2002-02-05· cited 229×
- State v. CoffinNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1999-10-06· cited 171×
- State v. ArmendarizNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-08-28· cited 91×
- State v. CrainNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-08-13· cited 68×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-04-07· cited 65×
- State v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2018-01-23· cited 53×
- State v. ElinskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1997-10-14· cited 52×
- Case v. HatchNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-04-15· cited 47×
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-04-15· cited 31×
- State v. PaizNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-09-21· cited 30×
- State v. ChavezNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1993-08-19· cited 22×
- State v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2016-05-23· cited 21×
- State v. Huerta-CastroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2016-11-29· cited 21×
- State v. BALENQUAHNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2009-03-13· cited 18×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-07-31· cited 18×
- State v. HuberNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2006-05-31· cited 17×
- State v. MaplesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-02-18· cited 15×
- State v. MaplesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2013-04-19· cited 2×
- State v. TorresNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2005-06-22
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Alexander v. Delgado Ex Rel. DelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1973-03-16· cited 314×
- Roy Allen Harich v. Richard Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, RespondentEleventh Circuit· 1988-04-21· cited 126×
- State v. FishNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-04-09· cited 118×
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-10-14· cited 106×
- State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1979-02-27· cited 89×
- State v. TalleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1985-06-04· cited 85×
- Jesse Joseph Trujillo v. George E. SullivanTenth Circuit· 1987-04-01· cited 79×
- State v. SwavolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-08-04· cited 75×
- Perrin v. AndersonTenth Circuit· 1986-02-27· cited 69×
- State v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1970-04-17· cited 47×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1992-08-31· cited 45×
- Hoffman v. Connecticut Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court· 1989-03-06· cited 43×
- State v. PowersNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1990-09-25· cited 42×
- Chacon v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1975-07-30· cited 39×
- State v. DeanNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-09-09· cited 38×
- State v. LamureNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1992-12-21· cited 33×
- State v. CastrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-10-15· cited 31×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.