New Mexico Supreme Court· 8/28/2006
State v. Armendariz
Citations
- 2006 NMSC 36
- 140 N.M. 182
- 2006 NMSC 036
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The first part of the test requires the determination of whether the conduct underlying the offenses is unitary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maes, Minzner, Serna, Bosson, Chávez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. SwickNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2012-06-01· cited 271×
- State v. WatkinsTennessee Supreme Court· 2012-03-09· cited 232×
- State v. GuerraNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2012-05-10· cited 227×
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2013-05-16· cited 187×
- State v. ArrendondoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2012-05-07· cited 182×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-05-18· cited 122×
- State v. RileyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2010-01-19· cited 103×
- State v. DowneyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-10-16· cited 103×
- State v. MontoyaNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-05-27· cited 102×
- State v. CaldwellNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-01-28· cited 86×
- State v. HugheyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-06-20· cited 72×
- State v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2008-10-09· cited 63×
- State v. BranchNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2018-01-23· cited 53×
- State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2008-08-14· cited 47×
- State v. UriosteNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2011-12-07· cited 46×
- State v. ContrerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-02-26· cited 45×
- United States v. Valentin Carrasco-TerceroFifth Circuit· 2014-03-13· cited 44×
- State v. ContrerasNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-04-16· cited 41×
- State v. CampbellNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-02-26· cited 38×
- State v. FordNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2007-03-08· cited 34×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 1,588×
- Iannelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1975-03-25· cited 1,423×
- Illinois v. VitaleSupreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 1,215×
- Swafford v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1991-05-01· cited 537×
- People v. RobideauMichigan Supreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 408×
- State v. AttawayNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1994-02-02· cited 264×
- Thigpen v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 173×
- State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-11-08· cited 160×
- State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1992-02-06· cited 157×
- State v. MeadorsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1995-11-06· cited 143×
- State v. SosaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-07-18· cited 102×
- State v. DominguezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2005-01-27· cited 50×
- State v. DeMaryNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-11-29· cited 46×
- State v. GallegosNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1986-06-04· cited 45×
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1992-08-31· cited 45×
- State v. FuentesNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1994-12-02· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.