Idaho Court of Appeals· 7/16/2001
State v. Babb
Citations
- 29 P.3d 406
- 136 Idaho 95
- 2001 Ida. App. LEXIS 73
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding video surveillance showing defendant’s detention and arrest can be sufficient to demonstrate a factual nexus between arrest and discovery of evidence
- holding video surveillance showing defendant’s detention and arrest can be sufficient to demonstrate a factual nexus between arrest and discovery of evidence
- holding video surveillance showing defendant’s detention and arrest can be sufficient to 5 demonstrate a factual nexus between arrest and discovery of evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lansing, Perry, Carey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. DelucaTenth Circuit· 2001-10-25· cited 99×
- State v. WiggintonIdaho Court of Appeals· 2005-09-09· cited 36×
- State v. McBaineIdaho Court of Appeals· 2007-03-22· cited 18×
- State v. George Alan KapelleIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-07-24· cited 15×
- State v. MaahsIdaho Supreme Court· 2023-03-07· cited 15×
- State v. VivianIdaho Supreme Court· 2022-10-04· cited 12×
- State v. LusbyIdaho Court of Appeals· 2008-06-05· cited 11×
- State v. MarshallIdaho Court of Appeals· 2008-09-05· cited 3×
- State v. RamosIdaho Court of Appeals· 2005-12-19· cited 2×
- State v. George KapelleIdaho Court of Appeals· 2014-05-07
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-03-24· cited 2,470×
- Rawlings v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 2,425×
- Segura v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 1,569×
- State v. AtkinsonIdaho Court of Appeals· 1996-04-10· cited 759×
- United States v. George WuagneuxEleventh Circuit· 1982-08-23· cited 251×
- United States v. Nava-RamirezTenth Circuit· 2000-04-10· cited 91×
- State v. HawkinsIdaho Court of Appeals· 1998-04-13· cited 75×
- State v. HaworthIdaho Supreme Court· 1984-03-19· cited 49×
- State v. PickIdaho Court of Appeals· 1993-10-25· cited 46×
- State v. BainbridgeIdaho Supreme Court· 1990-02-05· cited 44×
- United States v. Frank Sacco and Benjamin GentileSecond Circuit· 1977-10-05· cited 40×
- State v. HoakIdaho Supreme Court· 1984-12-07· cited 35×
- United States v. Teddy R. CrouchSeventh Circuit· 1976-03-18· cited 34×
- United States v. Richard Dennis KandikNinth Circuit· 1980-12-15· cited 34×
- State v. HollandIdaho Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 33×
- State v. LunaIdaho Court of Appeals· 1994-08-30· cited 23×
- State v. PetersIdaho Court of Appeals· 1997-12-24· cited 16×
- State v. TroughtonIdaho Court of Appeals· 1994-10-04· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.