State v. B Bar Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• standing is not a constitutional jurisdictional requirement and Arizona courts may consider questions despite lack of standing
• addressing merits because \standing is not a constitutional jurisdictional requirement\ in Arizona and other party failed to raise the issue on appeal
• standing is not a state court constitutional jurisdictional requirement, plus not raised by parties
• standing is not a state court constitutional jurisdictional requirement, plus not raised by parties
• \standing is not a constitutional jurisdictional requirement in the state courts of Arizona\
• for jurisdictional purposes, standing is not a constitutional requirement in Arizona courts; if not raised, a court may consider the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Martin v. Reinstein
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-05-13· cited 153×
• Sears v. Hull
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1998-07-16· cited 107×
• Father in Pima County Juvenile Action No. S-114487 v. Adam
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1994-06-23· cited 102×
• Armory Park Neighborhood Ass'n v. Episcopal Community Services
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-08-29· cited 97×
• Big D Construction Corp. v. Court of Appeals
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-03-28· cited 53×
• Toy v. Katz
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-07-08· cited 34×
• Fernandez v. Takata Seat Belts, Inc.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2005-03-24· cited 33×
• Schwab v. Matley
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1990-04-05· cited 32×
• Larsen v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-11-02· cited 29×
• D.R. Ward Construction Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-05-30· cited 27×
• Kerr v. Killian
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-04-13· cited 25×
• City of Tucson v. Woods
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-11-12· cited 23×
• State ex rel. Montgomery v. Mathis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-12-11· cited 21×
• Town of Miami v. City of Globe
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-11-03· cited 20×
• Blanchard v. Show Low Planning & Zoning Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-05-25· cited 19×
• Goodyear Farms v. City of Avondale
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1986-01-13· cited 16×
• Tonto Creek Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Arizona Corp. Commission
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-11-16· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Walter
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1983-03-14· cited 13×
• Seeley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-09-21· cited 11×
• Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. Associated Merchandising Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-11-09· cited 8×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Broadrick v. Oklahoma
  Supreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 4,338×
• Fuentes v. Shevin
  Supreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
• Dombrowski v. Pfister
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,255×
• Stanley v. Georgia
  Supreme Court· 1969-04-07· cited 1,725×
• Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton
  Supreme Court· 1973-10-09· cited 1,264×
• Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,096×
• Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-27· cited 976×
• State v. Bateman
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-03-10· cited 61×
• Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 2 v. Phoenix Employee Relations Board
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1982-01-07· cited 46×
• State v. Herrera
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1978-12-06· cited 41×
• City of Chicago v. Geraci
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-06-27· cited 34×
• State v. Duran
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-01-10· cited 13×