· 3/28/1990
Big D Construction Corp. v. Court of Appeals
Citations
- 789 P.2d 1061
- 163 Ariz. 560
- 89 A.L.R. 4th 567
- 57 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 8
- 1990 Ariz. LEXIS 55
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “reluctance to consider a moot or abstract question is solely a matter of prudential or judicial restraint”
- deciding the state constitutionality of Arizona's bid preference statute
- applying rational basis standard to equal protection claim under Arizona Constitution
- noting that “[a] perfect fit is not required”
- although state purposes were constitutionally permissible, the bid preference statute failed to further those purposes
- \We will consider cases that have become moot when significant questions of public importance are presented and are likely to recur.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Feldman, Gordon, Cameron, Moeller, Corcoran
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.