Skip to main content
· 3/28/1990

Big D Construction Corp. v. Court of Appeals

Citations

  • 789 P.2d 1061
  • 163 Ariz. 560
  • 89 A.L.R. 4th 567
  • 57 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 8
  • 1990 Ariz. LEXIS 55

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “reluctance to consider a moot or abstract question is solely a matter of prudential or judicial restraint”
  • deciding the state constitutionality of Arizona's bid preference statute
  • applying rational basis standard to equal protection claim under Arizona Constitution
  • noting that “[a] perfect fit is not required”
  • although state purposes were constitutionally permissible, the bid preference statute failed to further those purposes
  • \We will consider cases that have become moot when significant questions of public importance are presented and are likely to recur.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Gordon, Cameron, Moeller, Corcoran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.