Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1/20/1994

State v. Ayala

Citations

873 P.2d 1307
178 Ariz. 385
156 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 66
1994 Ariz. App. LEXIS 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reviewing a trial court’s decision to exclude evidence for “a clear, prejudicial abuse of discretion” (citations omitted)
To require reversal, the prejudice to the defendant from the trial court’s error “must be sufficient to create a reasonable doubt about whether the verdict might have been different.”
“Decisions on the admission and exclusion of evidence are left to the sound discretion of the trial court and will be reversed on appeal only when they constitute a clear, prejudicial abuse of discretion.”
“Decisions on the admission and exclusion of evidence are left to the sound discretion of the trial court, and will be reversed on appeal only when they constitute a clear, prejudicial abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Voss, McGregor, Kleinschmidt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.