Skip to main content

State v. Atkins

Citations

  • 2019 ND 145
  • 928 N.W.2d 441

Syllabus

A defendant may not avoid the procedures of the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act by designating his motion under a rule of criminal procedure or by filing his motion in his criminal file, rather than filing as a new action for post-conviction relief.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding evidence was not newly discovered where evidence was provided to defendant prior to trial but defendant admitted he “didn’t really read the discovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McEvers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.