Froistad v. State
Citations
- 959 N.W.2d 863
- 2021 ND 92
Syllabus
When a motion following conviction is denominated as a motion under the North Dakota Rules of Criminal Procedure, the provisions of the Uniform Postconviction Procedure Act, N.D.C.C. ch. 29-32.1, are applicable. Under N.D.C.C. § 29-32.1-12, an application for postconviction relief may be denied on the ground that the same claim or claims were fully and finally determined in a previous proceeding, or when the applicant presents a claim for relief which the applicant inexcusably failed to raise either in a proceeding leading to judgment of conviction and sentence or in a previous postconviction proceeding.
Judges: Tufte, Jerod E.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 2,470×
- United States v. Anthony P. Lafatch, and Mm CorporationSixth Circuit· 1977-11-18· cited 86×
- Riverwood Commercial Park, L.L.C. v. Standard Oil Co.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 65×
- Lobato v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado· 2003-04-28· cited 34×
- State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-12-08· cited 33×
- Froistad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-03-18· cited 27×
- State v. AtkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-05-24· cited 26×
- Myers v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-03-30· cited 24×
- State v. GressNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-12-13· cited 12×
- Froistad v. SchmalenbergerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-04-04· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.