State v. Ates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a judge must refrain from all comment that tends to indicate his opinion on the facts in controversy
• a judge must refrain from all comment that tends to indicate his opinion on the facts in controversy
• in grand larceny prosecution, value is critical element; it is State’s burden to prove value of stolen goods exceeds $200
• in grand larceny prosecution, value is critical element; it is State's burden to prove value of stolen goods exceeds $200
• in grand larceny prosecution, value is critical element; it is State's burden to prove value of stolen goods exceeds $200
• in grand larceny prosecution, value is critical element; it is State’s burden to prove value of stolen goods exceeds $200

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Joseph v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-10-14· cited 22×
• State v. Hartley
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-01-13· cited 19×
• State v. Parker
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-10-14· cited 14×
• State v. Barnett
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-08· cited 5×
• State v. Hawkins
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-12-11

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Moultrie
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-10-22· cited 16×
• Sosebee v. Leeke
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-09· cited 11×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-04-07· cited 9×
• State v. Campbell
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-12-05· cited 4×