Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/1/2023
State v. Ashford
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3139
Syllabus
Zmuda. Judgment denying dismissal after mistrial affirmed where defendants consented by stating they had no objection to mistrial and selecting new trial date, and the record demonstrated no prosecutorial intent to provoke a mistrial based on consent, manifest necessity to declare a mistrial not a consideration.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court· 1982-05-24· cited 2,097×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court· 1976-03-08· cited 1,492×
- State v. LozaOhio Supreme Court· 1994-11-30· cited 824×
- State v. GloverOhio Supreme Court· 1988-01-13· cited 270×
- United States v. Cheryl Lynne PuleoEleventh Circuit· 1987-05-26· cited 77×
- United States v. John M. GantleySixth Circuit· 1999-03-30· cited 64×
- State v. Mutter (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-05-24· cited 50×
- State v. Anderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-09-14· cited 48×
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1985-08-07· cited 33×
- In re S.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-07-23· cited 14×
- State v. OwensOhio Court of Appeals· 1998-03-31· cited 7×
- State v. CampbellOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-29· cited 2×
- United States v. OsaghaeSixth Circuit· 2001-09-20· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.