Skip to main content

State v. Arthur

Citations

  • 608 P.2d 90
  • 125 Ariz. 153
  • 1980 Ariz. App. LEXIS 474

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Whenever possible, a statute will be given such an effect that no clause, sentence, or word is rendered superfluous, void, contradictory or insignificant.”
  • we interpret statutes so no provision is rendered superfluous, void, contradictory, or insignificant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Froeb, Donofrio, Wren

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.