Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/1/1980
State v. Arroyo
Citations
- 181 Conn. 426
- 435 A.2d 967
- 1980 Conn. LEXIS 894
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Cohabitation] is the mutual assumption of those marital rights, duties and obligations which are usually manifested by married people, including but not necessarily dependent on sexual relations.”
- \Cohabitation ... includes many facets of married life in addition to sexual relations.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cotter, Cottee, Bogdanski, Petees, Paeskey, Shea
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-05-04· cited 123×
- State v. FullerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-03-25· cited 70×
- State v. PiersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-26· cited 69×
- State v. HavicanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-01-30· cited 51×
- State v. SmallSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-29· cited 47×
- State v. SuggsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-01-31· cited 41×
- Myers v. MyersUtah Supreme Court· 2011-10-21· cited 36×
- State v. DiggsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-06-18· cited 31×
- State v. CassinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-08-31· cited 29×
- Gordon v. GordonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1996-04-19· cited 29×
- State v. PludeConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-03-09· cited 24×
- State v. AndresenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-05-29· cited 23×
- State v. BooneConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-06-21· cited 22×
- State v. ValinskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-08-08· cited 20×
- State v. John F.M.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-02-19· cited 13×
- State v. ValinskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 1999-04-28· cited 8×
- State v. CayouetteConnecticut Appellate Court· 1991-08-06· cited 7×
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. ScullyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1985-02-05· cited 6×
- In Re RaybeckSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2012-05-11· cited 3×
- Cleary v. ClearyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-07-18
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.