Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/17/2017

State v. Arnold

Citations

2017 Ohio 559

Syllabus

Given the circumstances set forth in the affidavit, the judge issuing the search warrant had reason to conclude that a fair probability existed that drugs would be located at Appellant's residence the trial court accordingly did not err in overruling Appellant's motion to suppress. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Donovan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Maranger
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-13· cited 12×
State v. Vaughn
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-31· cited 4×
State v. Rigel
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-07-21· cited 3×
State v. Chebegwen
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-12

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Illinois v. Gates
Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
State v. George
Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 672×
Sgro v. United States
Supreme Court· 1932-12-05· cited 657×
State v. Jordan
Ohio Supreme Court· 2004-12-01· cited 641×
City of Maumee v. Weisner
Ohio Supreme Court· 1999-12-22· cited 485×
State v. Roberts
Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-05-14· cited 266×
State v. Mitchell
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-22· cited 7×
State v. McClain
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-11· cited 7×
State v. Oloff
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-21· cited 5×
State v. Richardson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-23· cited 5×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.